Capability template for finance and accounting

Weekly receivables summary

The finance lead takes one page into each week’s management meeting: what came in, where every receivable stands, which exceptions are open and who owns them, and the decisions management must make. Every figure ties to the aging report.

The outcome

Management sees receivables every week, in the same shape, on one page. The finance lead walks in knowing the cash that arrived, how each bracket moved and why, and whose desk each open exception sits on. The page ends with the decisions only management can make, each with its facts.

Month end stops being the first time anyone hears a client has gone past 60 days; the summary flags it the week before. The finance lead edits and approves the draft and decides what goes to management.

Who starts the work, and when

The billing coordinator or the controller runs it at the end of the weekly receivables cycle, after the exception list and follow-up plan are done. The finance lead reviews it the same day and presents it at the next management meeting.

What they supply

  • This week’s and last week’s aging reports.
  • The week’s receipts log, showing what was applied and what is held, and the invoices issued.
  • The exception list, with who acts and who decides on each item.
  • The follow-up plan: drafts due, holds and invoices not chased.
  • Last week’s summary, to carry open decisions forward.

What comes out

One page in a fixed order, with a tie-out line that proves the totals: last week’s open balance, plus invoices issued, minus cash applied, equals this week’s. If it does not tie, nothing is drafted until the billing coordinator finds why.

An invented example

Illustrative example with invented data. Complete weekly summary at an invented 60-person professional-services firm.

Weekly receivables summary: week of 21 September 2026

  • For: Finance lead, for the management meeting on Monday 28 September. Receipts 21 to 24 September; aging as of 25 September.
  • What came in: Five receipts, $16,100. Applied by the billing coordinator: $10,150, to 1038 and 1040 (Client B), 1047 (Client G) and $1,000 of 1042 (Client A). Held unapplied: $5,950 in two receipts, both with the controller.
  • Aging by bracket: Current $8,900 (last week $13,500). 1 to 30 days $11,400 ($9,900). 31 to 60 days $12,050 ($10,200). 61 to 90 days and over 90: none. Total open $32,350 ($33,600). Overdue $23,450, of which $3,800 is disputed.
  • Movements: Paid: 1038, 1040, 1047. Reduced: 1042, from $1,200 to $200. Issued: 1051, Client H, $8,900. Moved bracket: 1036 into 31 to 60 days; 1044 and 1045 into 1 to 30 days. Tie-out: $33,600 + $8,900 − $10,150 = $32,350.
  • Exceptions open: Four. 1042, $200: billing coordinator asking Client A. $5,600 wire: billing coordinator with the bank. $350 from Client J: Client J’s account lead. 1035, $3,800 disputed: Client E’s account lead. The controller decides each.
  • Follow-ups due: 1031, Client C, $6,400: from the account lead, finance lead copied. 1036, Client G, $1,850: from the billing coordinator, account lead copied. Held: 1042, 1044, 1045. Not chased: 1035.
  • Before month end: 1031 enters 61 to 90 days on 28 September. Once the controller decides where the wire belongs and the billing coordinator applies it to 1044 or 1045, 1 to 30 days falls to $5,800.
  • Decisions for management: Two. 1. Whether new work for Client C continues while 1031 is unpaid. 2. Whether Client E’s account lead may propose a resolution on 1035, including a credit, which the controller would then issue.

Every figure traces to the aging report as of 25 September and the receipts log for 21 to 24 September. The summary changes no records and sends nothing.

Where it fits

What has to change for your company

Decide who reads the page and on which day. Set your brackets and the movement size worth reporting. Agree which decisions go to management and which stay with the controller, such as credits above a set amount or pausing work for a client. Fix the section order once. Make the aging report the single source: when the summary and the ledger disagree, the ledger wins.

What has been checked

Fully Powered AI wrote this capability template. It was editorially reviewed on 9 November 2026. It has not yet been tested in a client environment. It has not yet been tested as a packaged version in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or Gemini.

Testing in your environment means running it on past weeks your finance lead already knows, with cases written in advance: totals that do not tie, an exception with no owner, a decision carried from last week. The finance lead checks every figure against the aging report before anyone relies on it. Pilot acceptance-test preparation sets those cases up, and what we test before we call an AI workflow ready describes the record we keep.

The full capability template

Everything above is the outline. The complete capability template is the working version: the roles, the inputs, the procedure, the exceptions and stop conditions, the output format, the reviewer checklist, the acceptance tests, the instructions for an AI assistant and what to customize for your company. It comes with a download and the link to its folder in Fully Powered’s public repository.

View the full template

Free with an account. Sign in by email: no password and no card.

Next step

Bring a real piece of this work to a call. We’ll walk through what it takes to fit this capability to your rules, prove it on your work and put it in the hands of the roles that own it.

Talk with us Discuss adapting this