Book a fit call

Workflows Directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

14 workflow templates

  • Course catalog quality check

    The registrar's office gets one comparison of a department's course updates against the current catalog export: codes, titles, credits, descriptions and linked components, row by row, with every conflict set out as a question for academic review. No catalog record is changed.

    Starts it
    Catalog coordinator
    Brings
    export, document
    Gets
    5 outputs

  • Course sequence and workload review

    A course lead revising an outline for the next cohort gets a module map: learning goals, prerequisites, activities and the instructor's own time estimates, with crowded weeks and coverage gaps marked and every gap written as a question. The course lead decides what changes.

    Starts it
    Course lead
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    4 outputs
    • People and HR (filtered by)
    • Quality management (filtered by)
    • Education (filtered by)

  • Engineering change affected records index

    When an engineering change request enters review, the document controller gets one index: the assemblies, revisions, stock and open purchase orders the change reaches in the exports supplied, and a question for each owner wherever the records are unclear.

    Starts it
    Document controller
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    3 outputs

  • Hiring pipeline status report

    Each week your people lead or founder sees every open role on one page: applications at each stage, days open against the target, roles running late, pass-through between stages, which sources lead to interviews, and every blocker with its owner. It counts; it never assesses a candidate.

    Starts it
    People lead
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    6 outputs

  • Interview process review after a hiring round

    After a hiring round closes, the recruiting lead gets a review of the interview process: questions that gave no usable evidence, competencies nobody covered, inconsistent rubric use, and revisions to approve before the next search. It reviews the process only; no candidate is assessed.

    Starts it
    Recruiting lead
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    6 outputs

  • Job description

    A hiring manager’s rough notes become a job description the right people want to answer: why the role exists, the work itself, and only the must-haves that are real. Your approved pay and employer wording go in untouched, and nothing is posted until the hiring manager and the people lead approve it.

    Starts it
    Hiring manager
    Brings
    notes, document
    Gets
    2 outputs

  • Learning system access review

    At term end or after staff change roles, the system owner lays the learning system's user and access exports beside current staff, class assignments and the approved role matrix. Departed users, changed roles and dormant accounts come back as questions for the data owners. Nothing is changed.

    Starts it
    System owner
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    7 outputs

  • Payroll preparation and timesheet review

    Before each payroll run, the owner gets one sheet built from the timesheet and roster exports: hours by person and type, every missing punch and odd entry raised as a question, and an estimated total. Nothing is keyed in, submitted or paid until a person approves.

    Starts it
    Payroll clerk
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    7 outputs

  • Policy answers from the handbook

    Staff questions about leave, hours, expenses and conduct get answers that quote your own handbook, name the section, and say plainly where the handbook is silent. Anything about one person's own entitlement goes to HR, and no reply leaves until a person has read it.

    Starts it
    Office manager
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    4 outputs

  • Service roster options

    For a department manager building a rota for expected occupancy, covers or events: two or three roster options side by side, with each role's need, the staff confirmed available, the periods left uncovered and the labor-cost assumptions you supplied. You verify and approve; nothing is published.

    Starts it
    Department manager
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    5 outputs

  • Site safety induction pack

    For one named site, the site, facilities or people lead gets an induction built from that site's own emergency arrangements, rules and hazards, with a short check of understanding, a sign-off record for each person and refresher dates by role. A competent person approves it and delivers it.

    Starts it
    Site manager
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    6 outputs
    • People and HR (filtered by)
    • Hospitality (filtered by)
    • Construction

  • Teaching tool vendor data questions

    Before a school or college adopts a teaching tool that would handle student or staff information, the privacy or procurement lead gets a scoped question pack on data flows, access, retention and subprocessors, with each supplied vendor document mapped to the questions and the gaps listed.

    Starts it
    Privacy lead
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    5 outputs

  • Training needs analysis

    For one team, the HR lead or team manager gets what each role must be able to do, how many people can do it now, where the team falls short, and the training to arrange first, with who arranges it and by when. Counted by role, never a rating of a named person.

    Starts it
    Team manager
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    5 outputs

  • Volunteer shift options

    A volunteer lead gets draft shift options once an event's availability replies are in: each role's needs set against who volunteered, the requirements on record and the shifts already confirmed, with every uncovered position shown. The lead checks and confirms; nothing is assigned or sent.

    Starts it
    Volunteer lead
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    4 outputs