Book a fit call

Workflows Directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

9 workflow templates

  • Case chronology from the matter documents

    From the document set the handling attorney approved, the paralegal or associate prepares a draft chronology for that attorney: each event with its source and Bates number or page, document dates kept apart from event dates, conflicting accounts side by side, and the gaps. What matters is left to the attorney.

    Starts it
    Paralegal
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    5 outputs

    Prepares work for a lawyer. Not legal advice.

  • Citation and quotation check

    Before a draft is filed or relied on, the associate or paralegal has one worksheet: every citation, quotation and record cite counted, then set against the sources supplied, and every good-law check left for the lawyer. No result calls anything confirmed; each says only what was compared.

    Starts it
    Associate
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    4 outputs

    Prepares work for a lawyer. Not legal advice.

  • Deposition transcript summary

    Before the next deposition, a motion or trial, the attorney has a draft page-line summary of the transcript, arranged by the topics they named: every point cited, every exhibit and objection logged, and every place the testimony differs flagged without a label. The attorney decides what it means.

    Starts it
    Paralegal
    Brings
    notes, document
    Gets
    8 outputs

    Prepares work for a lawyer. Not legal advice.

  • Hiring pipeline status report

    Each week your people lead or founder sees every open role on one page: applications at each stage, days open against the target, roles running late, pass-through between stages, which sources lead to interviews, and every blocker with its owner. It counts; it never assesses a candidate.

    Starts it
    People lead
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    6 outputs

  • Interview plan and scorecard

    Before the first interview, the hiring manager and every interviewer share one plan: the criteria the role needs, the same questions in the same order for every candidate, and a blank scorecard each person fills in alone. It rates no one. People make every decision about a candidate.

    Starts it
    Hiring manager
    Brings
    notes, document
    Gets
    7 outputs

  • Interview process review after a hiring round

    After a hiring round closes, the recruiting lead gets a review of the interview process: questions that gave no usable evidence, competencies nobody covered, inconsistent rubric use, and revisions to approve before the next search. It reviews the process only; no candidate is assessed.

    Starts it
    Recruiting lead
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    6 outputs

  • Job description

    A hiring manager’s rough notes become a job description the right people want to answer: why the role exists, the work itself, and only the must-haves that are real. Your approved pay and employer wording go in untouched, and nothing is posted until the hiring manager and the people lead approve it.

    Starts it
    Hiring manager
    Brings
    notes, document
    Gets
    2 outputs

  • Job posting and sourcing plan

    For one approved role, the hiring manager gets a plan for where to post and where to look: every channel on the company's own list ordered by the signal it should give for that kind of role, a week-by-week schedule inside the budget, and what to count on each channel. Nothing is posted or paid until a person approves.

    Starts it
    Hiring manager
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    4 outputs

  • Reference check question plan

    After the interviews, the recruiter gets short reference calls aimed only at what the panel still could not establish, put to the referees the candidate named and agreed to, with a note sheet for each call that keeps the referee's own words. It gives no view on the candidate.

    Starts it
    Recruiter
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    6 outputs