Workflows Directory
Find your team’s next superpower.
- Function: Product management
- Function: Quality management
- Function: Recruiting and hiring
- Clear all filters
Results
58 workflow templates, showing 1 to 24
Acceptance criteria sheet
Hand a developer or agency a story with its definition of done written down: testable expected behaviours, error cases and edge cases, each traced to a rule or design state, with the unclear terms and open questions listed for the product owner.
- Starts it
- Product owner
- Brings
- notes
- Gets
- 5 outputs
Assumption map
For a product owner whose plan rests on beliefs nobody has tested: each belief is written down, set against the evidence you hold, ranked by what it would do to the plan, and given a cheap test to choose from. You decide what to test; no evidence is invented.
- Starts it
- Product owner
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 6 outputs
Audit evidence index
The quality lead gets an index of everything an audit has asked to see: each request linked to the document that answers it, its version and owner, the records found and the gaps. The quality owner decides what is shared; nothing is certified or sent.
- Starts it
- Quality lead
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 6 outputs
Batch distribution trace
When the quality lead needs to know where one production batch went, they get a map from the batch record to every recorded shipment: quantities, transfers and repacking links, with each gap in the trace written as a question. It decides no hold and contacts nobody.
- Starts it
- Quality lead
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 6 outputs
Business model assumptions review
Before you commit money to a new or revised business model, see it block by block with every claim marked evidenced or assumed, the riskiest assumptions ranked, and the cheapest test for each. You choose what to test; no projection or valuation is made.
- Starts it
- Founder
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 7 outputs
Candidate outreach drafting
For each person a recruiter or founder has already chosen to approach about an approved role: a first message and two follow-ups, each personal line traced to a public work source the recruiter supplied, do-not-contact names and opt-outs honoured, and a reply log. The recruiter sends every message.
- Starts it
- Recruiter
- Brings
- export, document
- Gets
- 5 outputs
Client report check log
Before a batch of client reports is released, the reporting lead gets a log, report by report, of household membership, periods, totals against the custodian statements, fee figures and missing sections, with every difference marked for correction. Nothing is released or sent.
- Starts it
- Reporting lead
- Brings
- export, notes, document
- Gets
- 5 outputs
Completed engagement file review
The quality partner gets a worksheet that tests finished engagement files against the firm's own checklist: each item linked to the engagement letter, workpaper or sign-off that answers it, with any open finding, and the missing evidence listed. The quality partner confirms findings and assigns remediation.
- Starts it
- Quality partner
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 4 outputs
Component inventory audit
When patterns come up for review, the design-system owner gets an inventory built from the library export and its documentation: every component with its naming, token and state gaps, and the pairs that may overlap. Nothing is merged on appearance; the owner decides.
- Starts it
- Design-system owner
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 4 outputs
Cost of poor quality worksheet
An owner or operations lead who senses that rework, scrap and returns are costly gets one worksheet: the failure costs already on record, sorted by category, with estimates, gaps and unresolved allocations listed. The owner decides what to fix first.
- Starts it
- Owner
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 6 outputs
Course catalog quality check
The registrar's office gets one comparison of a department's course updates against the current catalog export: codes, titles, credits, descriptions and linked components, row by row, with every conflict set out as a question for academic review. No catalog record is changed.
- Starts it
- Catalog coordinator
- Brings
- export, document
- Gets
- 5 outputs
Course sequence and workload review
A course lead revising an outline for the next cohort gets a module map: learning goals, prerequisites, activities and the instructor's own time estimates, with crowded weeks and coverage gaps marked and every gap written as a question. The course lead decides what changes.
- Starts it
- Course lead
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 4 outputs
Current experience baseline
Before a redesign, the design lead gets a baseline built from the captures and page list they supply: each page read with its content and design observations, the patterns that recur, and the pages outside the evidence. The lead confirms the baseline and sets the scope.
- Starts it
- Design lead
- Brings
- export, notes, document
- Gets
- 6 outputs
Customer feedback themes
Each month your support lead sees what customers keep telling you: tickets, disputes, reviews and survey comments grouped into themes with counts and quotations, the three issues most worth fixing with a proposed fix and owner, and a note for customers once a fix ships. A person decides every fix.
- Starts it
- Support lead
- Brings
- export, notes, document
- Gets
- 5 outputs
Customer interview synthesis
Turn a stack of customer call notes into the answer to one question, in your customers’ own words. Every quotation is cited to the note it came from, every theme shows its confidence and the evidence against it, and nothing is claimed that the notes do not say.
- Starts it
- Founder
- Brings
- notes
- Gets
- 5 outputs
Deliverable issue completeness check
As a calculation, report or drawing package nears issue, the quality reviewer or document controller gets a checklist: missing review records, revisions that disagree between the index, the register and the title block, and citations of out-of-date calculations. Issue stays with the engineers.
- Starts it
- Quality reviewer
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 5 outputs
Dental lab case tracker
The office coordinator keeps one tracker of every case at an outside dental lab: when it went, the lab's due date against the patient's seating, which cases are overdue or due back too late, each remake with its stated reason, and each lab's on-time record for the quarter. A person calls every lab.
- Starts it
- Office coordinator
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 4 outputs
Employee onboarding plan
Every new colleague starts with a first week and a first 90 days planned to the standard of your best manager: what to read, who to meet, what to practice and what productive means at day 30, 60 and 90.
- Starts it
- Hiring manager
- Brings
- notes, document
- Gets
- 6 outputs
Feedback follow-through updates
When a change ships or a decision lands on something customers asked for, your account owner gets the list of who asked, the confirmed status of each request, and an individual draft update for each person in the channel they prefer. No update promises a date or feature the team has not confirmed.
- Starts it
- Account manager
- Brings
- export, notes, document
- Gets
- 5 outputs
Hiring pipeline status report
Each week your people lead or founder sees every open role on one page: applications at each stage, days open against the target, roles running late, pass-through between stages, which sources lead to interviews, and every blocker with its owner. It counts; it never assesses a candidate.
- Starts it
- People lead
- Brings
- export, notes, document
- Gets
- 6 outputs
Incident investigation and corrective actions
After an injury, near miss or property damage, the site, operations or safety manager gets the investigation written up from the evidence: a timeline, the immediate and underlying causes, actions with owners and dates, and a register that follows each action until a check shows it worked.
- Starts it
- Site manager
- Brings
- export, notes, document
- Gets
- 8 outputs
Interview plan and scorecard
Before the first interview, the hiring manager and every interviewer share one plan: the criteria the role needs, the same questions in the same order for every candidate, and a blank scorecard each person fills in alone. It rates no one. People make every decision about a candidate.
- Starts it
- Hiring manager
- Brings
- notes, document
- Gets
- 7 outputs
Interview process review after a hiring round
After a hiring round closes, the recruiting lead gets a review of the interview process: questions that gave no usable evidence, competencies nobody covered, inconsistent rubric use, and revisions to approve before the next search. It reviews the process only; no candidate is assessed.
- Starts it
- Recruiting lead
- Brings
- export, notes
- Gets
- 6 outputs
Interview scheduling and candidate confirmation
For candidates your team has already chosen to interview, the recruiting coordinator gets one scheduling sheet that lines up each candidate's offered times, in their own time zone, with the interviewers' free time, plus a ready confirmation or availability request for each. A person sends every message and invitation.
- Starts it
- Recruiting coordinator
- Brings
- export, notes, pasted text
- Gets
- 5 outputs